Australia's
hard-hitting policy of detaining asylum seekers in offshore detention centres
has been shrouded in secrecy. Film producer and director, Eva Orner has finally
lifted the lid on this sinister practice. It is not a ‘feel good’ documentary,
or one for the faint-hearted. Ori Golan spoke to her.
Odious,
pernicious and sinister. These are the adjectives Eva Orner chooses to describe
the Australian government’s treatment of the 2,175 ‘boat people’ who have washed
up on Australia’s shores after 19 July 2013, the day the Australian government
instigated the ‘PNG Solution.’ Ever since, asylum seekers who arrive by boat
are routinely flown out of Australia, for off-shore processing, with a
guarantee that they will never be allowed to settle in the country.
For
its part, the Australian government – from both sides of the political divide –
has defended these hard hitting measures as necessary to deter people smugglers
from making the perilous journey from Indonesia to Australia by boat, and
putting the lives of so many at risk. While no official records are kept by any
government agency, the estimated number of deaths at sea of asylum seekers on
their way to Australia, is in the region of 1000. It is undeniable that this
policy has been remarkably effective. The arrival of these boats into Australia
has ground to zero.
Orner,
doesn’t buy into it.
“We
are the only country which puts children in indefinite detention,” she says. “I
want people to know that right now there is child abuse, rape, harassment and
inhumane treatment of people who have fled for their lives and are languishing
in detention centres, indefinitely. And it is being done in our name, by our
government. I think we should be deeply ashamed.”
I
meet Orner in Bondi beach, Australia’s most famous surfing beach, as the rain
pummels the promenade and we run for cover. We arrive in her luxurious hotel
suite overlooking the ocean. She pours tea into a mug, then settles into a
chair and bites into a pear. As we chat, text messages in her iPhone ping
intermittently, her iPad emits sounds to announce new emails and she holds her
laptop to check some facts. She is clearly switched on.
Orner
is in Sydney for the screening of her documentary, Chasing Asylum, which
trains the spotlight on Australia’s treatment of asylum seekers in offshore
detention centres on two remote islands in the Pacific Ocean: Manus Island,
belonging to Papua New Guinea, and the Republic of Nauru, a tiny island country
in Micronesia.
“I
was expecting someone else to make a documentary on this subject”, she recalls,
“but I soon discovered why it had not been done. It is an impossible film to
make and story to tell. It is about places you are not allowed to visit, people
you are not allowed to speak to, things you are not allowed to know.”
And
therein lies the singularity of the film. Despite the strict limitations and
many prohibitions imposed by the Australian government, Orner’s film lifts the
lid for the first time on the living conditions of those people who, fleeing
war or persecution in their homeland, were placed out of sight of the
Australian public, with the hope they would also remain out of mind.
Successive
Australian governments have gone to extraordinary lengths to block access to
information relating to its offshore detention centres. Facts, figures, names
and stories of refugees, all remain behind a cloak of secrecy. Filming them is
strictly prohibited and government officials remain tight-lipped about policies
inside these off-shore immigration detention facilities. Access into either
facilities is closely guarded. A visa application to fly to Nauru costs $8000
AUS, making it the world’s most expensive visa.
But it
gets worse.
Last
year the Australian government passed the Australian Border Force Act,
which makes it a criminal offense to speak out about conditions in offshore
detention camps. “This law is particularly odious”, Orner stabs her index
finger on the coffee table. “If you’re a
government employee - which everyone there is - and you speak out about things
that go on in the camp, your risk a two year prison sentence. The gagging law
prohibits contractors such as doctors, social workers and aid workers reporting
on abuse, rape or violence”. The spectre of prosecution has silenced most
witnesses and the climate of fear has prevented most of the hundreds of service
providers working on Manus island and Nauru from coming forward and sharing their
experiences.
Despite
all this, Orner managed to obtain secretly filmed footage from inside both
Nauru and Manos Island detention camps. The result is a chronicle of untold
suffering; of men, women and children locked up in confined spaces with little
privacy. It depicts life in limbo, characterised by uncertainty, fear,
frustration and vulnerability. The clandestine phone-camera pans across security
fences, gravel walkways, walls, doors, tents flaps, rows of bunk beds, filthy
toilets and run-down facilities. The frame suddenly captures an inmate curled
up on his bed, in despair. Chasing Asylum is a study in the crashing of
the human spirit.
A
former safety and security officer on Manus Island tells how asylum seekers are
accommodated in a former World War II hut made of tin, with a concrete floor,
holding 122 double bunks. “Manus Island is tropical and these guys were housed
in a tin shed. It was disgusting. The odour was disgusting. I just couldn’t
believe what I was looking at.”
An
interview with a former social worker working in the Nauru detention camp,
paints the grimmest of pictures: “There was malaria. There was sickness,
disease, infection. I was seeing daily harm, up to four a day. I saw men cut
their stomachs open with glass; a young man stitched his lips with needle and
thread; one man took a florescent light tube and beat himself with it across
his head. […] There were men swallowing washing powder, swallowing razor
blades. People tried to hang themselves with ropes, fan chords, knitting wool.
The deterioration among all asylum seekers, regardless of age, is what’s
hardest to see. People there have very real mental issues which they did not
have before. Some are talking to themselves; others have psychotic episodes.
Many are on anti-depressants and still have suicidal intentions.”
From
January to August 2015, there were 74 reported incidents of self-harm on Nauru
and 34 on Manus Island. Exploitation is rife and is often manifested in the
daily, almost routine, aspects of life in these centres such as an incident
involving a guard who demanded to see a female detainee naked in return for
allowing her an extra two minutes in the shower with her young child.
The
most appalling of testimonies in this documentary is given by a young support
worker who was employed in Manus Island and whose face is outside the camera
frame. She relates the disastrous effects which indefinite detention has had
young children, describing in chilling details incidents of sexual abuse and
sexualised behaviours among children as young as 5. Children, she says, refer
to themselves by their boats ID numbers and not by their name. “It’s like
they’ve forgotten their own names”, she summarises, audibly upset. She goes on
to describe a terrifying scene she witnessed when an asylum seeker was severely
bashed by security guards, sustaining serious injuries. Later, when she made a
deposition for the Nauruan police investigating the incident, she was pressurised
to change her witness account and report that the guards only pushed him.
When
claims of self-harm and sexual abuse became public, the Australian government acted
swiftly. All the staff of Save the Children on Nauru were sacked and
deported, charged with fabricating stories and ‘coaching and facilitating’ the
people in the detention centre to self-harm. [In May this year, the government
reached an out-of-court settlement with the organisation and admitted that the
allegations were unsubstantiated.]
“These
places are essentially prisons”, sums up Orner, “but unlike prisoners, they
have not been handed a sentence and there is no indication when they’ll get
out. They have committed no crime, but they are treated like criminals and have
no end date. Day 1 is the same as day 601. Many of the people on Manus Island
and Nauru have been there for over 1000 days.”
“The
Australian government”, explains Orner, “is trying to make it worse for asylum
seekers in these detention centres than where they originally came from, so
that they go back. Some do go home, often to persecution; some to prison”.
Indeed, the documentary follows Orner as she visits detainees who have gone
back to their homelands having given up on the dream of Australia. “Their
situation is pretty dire. They cannot get travel documents and they are
essentially trapped.”
When I ask her about the
provenance of the footage from inside the camps, Orner obfuscates. She does,
however, acknowledge the incredible bravery of former employees in these
detention centres who agreed to go on record. As far as she’s concerned they
are the true heroes. “All of them suffer from post-traumatic stress, to some
degree. Hopefully this film will embolden more people to speak out because when
you look back in history, it’s the whistle blowers who change everything; they
risk everything.”
In July last year Orner found
herself in chambers with criminal QCs who were assessing whether she or the
whistle blowers in the film, could go to prison for telling the truth about
government policies.
How
has making this documentary affected her, I ask. Her reply is somewhat oblique
and yet also candid: “This is not a job where you come home, switch off and
watch television. This sort of stuff is upsetting. You come close to things you
can never forget.” After a pause, she continues. “I met a young African
refugee who had been raped on Nauru while suffering an epileptic fit. When she
discovered she was pregnant she sought to have an abortion but in Papua New
Guinea abortions are illegal. She begged authorities to let her come to
Australia to terminate the pregnancy, but the government refused to allow her
into Australia. She ended up having the baby.” Recounting this, clearly moves
her.
Orner
is no stranger to explosive or divisive subject matters. At 46, she already has
five films to her name. In 2007 she produced Taxi to the Dark Side which
won the Academy Award for best documentary Feature that year. The film investigates
the killing an innocent Afghan taxi driver who was horrifically tortured to
death by American soldiers in Bagram base in Afghanistan.
So
is this another in a series of controversial documentaries? She shakes her
head. “No, this one is deeply personal for me. My parents were born in 1937 in Poland. Three of my grandparents died in the Holocaust. I am first generation
Australian. My family were lucky enough to come to this country as immigrants. I
had a very fortunate, happy upbringing in Melbourne and a solid Jewish
education which informs and guides what I do. Australia is a signatory to the
Refugee Convention of 1951 which afforded my family protection and the right to
live here.”
Chasing
Asylum is a
sobering, chilling, harrowing documentary. It tells a story and paints a
reality which has been painstakingly put together through interviews, smuggled
footage and erudite analysis. It is a story that is still in the making. In her
quest to expose the plight of asylum seekers who have turned to Australia for
protection, Orner travelled to Afghanistan, Lebanon, Iran, Lebanon, Cambodia
and Indonesia. “The only place I was not able to travel to is Nauru”, she
smiles.
As we
wrap up our interview, I ask her squarely: what is the solution? She barely
waits for me to finish the question. “They will have to shut them [Nauru and
Manus island detention centres] down. They cannot keep them going. It is a
blight on our reputation. We are a laughing stock internationally. We have
damaged these people irrevocably.”
No comments:
Post a Comment